Insights
Writing drawn from what we have actually built.
OpticEMR carries literature-cited clinical tools inside the encounter workflow. The thinking behind them is worth publishing on its own terms — so this is where it will go, once each piece has a clinician's name against it.
Published
In preparation
Every piece here comes out of clinical work we have really done. That is a deliberately higher bar than general commentary, and it is why this page fills at the pace it does — and why it is worth reading when it does.
Write to us and we will tell you directly when the first ones land.
In preparation
Each of these draws on a tool that is running inside OpticEMR today, not on a topic we would like to have an opinion about.
- In preparation
Clinical tools belong in the workflow, not in a second tab
The design argument for putting literature-cited decision support inside the encounter, and what it costs when it sits outside.
Draws on Clinical intelligence, across OpticEMR